The complexity of cancer care has significantly increased over the year. What was onCE Considered Single diseases
The challenge
This has created a growing challenge for oncologist, who must manage a wide variety of cancer types while also also keeping up with rapidly changing best practices.
Another Large Challenge in Oncology Today is the Sheer Volume and Complexity of Evolving Clinical Guidelines. National Organizations Such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and American Cancer Society Society regularly update their recourse Year, Based on New Clinical Trial Data, Emerging Therapies and Evolving Treatment Paradigms.
These guidelines are not allays Standardized Across Organizations, and individual cancer centers often add their own layers of Expertise, Making it even for Dificult For Clinicians to Trackk and Apply The Latter Practices consistently.
At the same time, access to specialized oncologists is by doing more different, said Dr. Travis Zack, Assistant Professor of Medicine at the University of California at San Francisco.
“Many regions are facing shortages of oncology specialists, FORCING General Practitioners to take on More Responsibility for Initial Cancer Workups and Treatment Planning,” He He Explied. “However, GPS often Lack the Time or Specialized Training to Stay Fully updated on the latest oncology guidelines, which can lead to inconsistencies in care and delays in treatment.
“There’s also the fundamental challenge of unstructed patient and the time it takes to aggregate and review that information, in account with updated treatment guidelines, in Order to make the best post Recommendations for the patient, “He Continued.
Recognizing these challenges, The University of California at San Francisco LOKED to Develop Ai Technology That Cold Automate The Process of Aggregating, Structuring and Applying The Latest Clinical Guideline For Oncologists, Along with all of the information on the patients.
“The goal was to create a decision support system that could be seamlessly integrate national guidelines and patient data with local institutional institutional best proactions, ensuring Every Patint Recovery Up-to-date, evidence-based care possible-without adding additional cognitive burden to Alredy overworked clinicians, “Zak noted.
“This Fundamental Challenge-ENCOLOGISTS HAD Quick, Reliable Access to Up-to-Date, Evidence-Based Recommendations While Optimizing Physician Time-LED Us to Explore Ai-DRIVEN SYSTEMS That count make world-class oncology Expertise more accessible, Efficiency and Scalable Across All Care Settings, “He Added.
Proposal
The AI System would combine a large language model, informed by all of the applicable national and local institutional guidelines, with transparent logic so clinicians could so clinicians Its recommendations.
The goal was to ensure Every oncology consultation Began with a Complete, Structured and Up-to-Date Dataset, Reducing Information Gaps and Optimizing Physician Time to Complete PATINT WORKUPS.
To achieve this, zack explained the ai was designed with two core functions:
Aggregating and structuring clinical data – The system pulls and organizes relevant patients from electronic health records to create a Comprehensive View of the Patient’s Condition. If Critical Data – Such as Biopsy Results, Molecular Testing or Staging Scans – Is Missing, The AI Flags it before the Oncology Consultation to Prevent UNNECESSARY DALAYS.
Integrating National and Local Clinical Guidelines -The AI Incorporates Bot Standard Guidelines (from sources like NCCN, ACS and ASCO) And Institution-Specific Protocols, Insuring Physicians Are Presented With the MOTHE TREVANT, UP-to-Dete Treatment Recommendations Tailored to the Patient’s Specific Case.
“For example, if a patient is referred for suspected lung cancer, the system can automatically assess whether all Necessary Diagnostic Steps Have Been Taken,” Zack Explained. “If a key test is missing, it prompts the referring physician to order it before the patient’s oncology visit. Reducing the cognitive burden on the physician while ensuring adherence to best practices.
“The overarching goal was not to replace human Judgment but to enhance it – allowing oncologists to focus on personalized treatment decisions rather than spending Valuable Time Retrie Information, “He added.
Meeting the challenge
The Ai Technology was deployed in Oncology Workflows to Support Both General Practitioners and Oncologists, ENSURING EACH STEP IN THE STEP in the Patient Journey was guided by Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Insights.
For the Study UCSF Published, Health IT and Clinical Services Company Color Clinicians Analyzed 100 de-Adentified Patient Cases Provided by UCSF-50 for BRAST CANCER and 50 For Breast Cancer. Each Case Included Two Sets of Records: Diagnosis Records, Containing all available information up to and include the date of diagnosis, and treatment records, encompassing all records up to, Including, the date of treatment, was initiated.
To evaluate the Ai, color clinicians processed these cases in two phases:
Diagnosis Run Type: 100 Patient Cases (50 Breast, 50 Colon) Using only records available up to the date of diagnosis.
Treatment Run Type: 100 Patient Cases (50 Breast, 50 Colon) With Records Included Up to, But Not Beyond, The Treatment Initiation Date.
“A primary care physician at color reviewed the AI-Generated Output and Made Adjustments where Necessary,” Zack Said. “The system’s performance was assessed by tracking the number of modifications made in three key areas: Accuracy of Extracated Decision Factors, Relevance of Revanced Workups to the Patient ‘CONDITION’ and Completeness of Relevant Workups. Additional, the study recorded the time required for the clinician to finalize Eve planup plan using the ai.
“The AI system was integrated with electronic health records and other medical databases to streamline access to and interpretation of patient information,” He Continuated. “PATIENT DATA WAS De-Adentimed to Protect Confidatiicality. The system Types. “
So how did it work in practice? Like this:
Data Aggregation and Structuring. Before an oncology consultation, the ai automatically compiled all related clinical information from the Patient’s records and identified Missing Diagnostic Steps.
Guideline-based recommendations. At the point of care, the system provided tailored recommendations based on National Guidelines and Institution-Specific Policies.
Continuous learning and updates. The ai dynamically incorporated the latest clinical research and guideline updates, ensuring phaysicians always worked with the most current evidence.
“By Reducing Time Spent on Administer Tasks and Eliminating inconsistencies in care, the AI allowed oncologists to focus on patient interactions and treatment plans, with the intelligence of fasting and more Effective Cancer Care, “Zack Said.
Results
The Implementation of Ai in Oncology Workflows has LED to Measurable Improvements in Efficiency and Decision Making. One of the most notable outstcomes has been a significant reduction in the time oncologists spend reviewing patients and clinical guidelines prior to make treatment decisions.
“Previous, this process could take one to two hours, particular for complex cases requires a Review of Extensive Medical History and Evolving Guideline recommendations,” ZACKKKKKKKKKKKKKENG. “With the AI System in place, this time has been reduced to approximately 10 to 15 minutes in most cases. On Decision Making Rather Than Manual Data Retrieval.
“Another key finding has been the high level of alignment between ai-generated recommendations and thats made by oncologists,” He continued. “In a comparative study, there was a 95% concordance between the ai’s treatment recommendations and clinical decisions made by oncologists based on Standard Guidelines.”
This sugges the AI system is effectively synthesizing and applying National and Institute Guidelines in a way that supports clinical decision making, he added. While human oversight remains essential, this level of agrement indicates the ai can serve as a reliable tool for reinforcing evidence-based care, he said.
“Additional, the system has contributed to improvements in the timeliness of treatment initiation,” Zack reported. “Delays in Ordering Essential Diagnostic Tests – Such as Biopsies or Genomic Testing – Can Expend the Time Between Diagnosis and Treatment, Sometimes by Weeks or Monts.
“By identifying missing but Necessary Workups Earlier in the process, the AI System Has Helped Reduce these delays, Ensuring that Patients Progress to Treatment in a Timelier Manner,” “Given that early intervention is critical in oncology, this reduction in delays represents an important improvement in patient care.”
Overall, these results sugges ai can play a meaningful role in Improving Efficiency, Standardization and Timeliness in Oncology Care, Particularly in Settings, Settings to speck Limited, he added.
Advice for other
For Healthcare Organizations Looking to Integrate AI INTO Oncology or other Specialies, A Strategic and Structured Approach to implementation is essential, zack.
“One of the primary consider is ensuring the AI System Has Access to Comprehensive and Accurate PATENT DATA,” He said. “AI-Driven Decision Support tools relay on a full dataset to generate clinically meaningful recommendations.
“However, interoperability challenges between electronic health records and other data sources can result in incomplete in incomplete clinical pictures, which may affect the relativity of ai outputs. “Addressing these gaps through effective data integration and standardization should be a priority before implementation.”
Another Important Factor is the Balance Between AI-Driven recommendations and Clinical Judgment, He Noted.
“Ai should be Viewed as a tool to support, rather than replace, oncologists and other healthcare provides,” He Stressed. “Organizations Should Ensure Clinicians Remain Activly engaged in interpreting ai-generated insurance and are removed to override or modify recommendations when Necessary.
“To facilitate this, AI Systems Should Provide Transparent and Explainable Decision Pathways, allowing users to understand how recommendations were generated,” He concluded. “Clear Visibility Into The Underling Logic Builds Trust in AI-ASSISTED Decision Making and Promotes Adoption Amg Clinicians.”
Follow Bill’s Hit Coverage on LinkedIn: Bill Siwicki
Email him: bsiwicki@himss.org
Healthcare it news is a Himss Media Publication.
Watch Now: Seattle Children’s Chief AI Officer Talks Better Outcomes Through the Technology
